|
|
|
RHINOMANOMETER
REFERENCES 1.Intranasal Allergen Challenge during Corticosteroid Treatment.
Clinical Allergy 1977 Vol. 7 69 74. 2.Rhinomanometric Recording in Children. Rhinology 1980 Vol. 18 31 42. 3.Assessment of the Nasopharyngeal Airway. Acta A Otolaryngol 1980 Vol. 89 227-232 4.Measurement of Nasal Airflow and Resistance. J. of the Royal Soc. of Med. Vol. 72 852 855 November 1979 5.A pre and postoperative evaluation in functional Septoplasty.
Acta Otolaryngol 1982 Vol. 94
523 529 6.Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry
Rhinology 1984 Vo122 151 -155 7.The effects of Camphor, Eucalyptus and Menthol vapour on Nasal
Resistance to airflow and nasal sensation. Acta Otolaryngol 1983 Vo196 157 161 8.The effect of Menthol on Nasal Resistance to airflow J of Laryngology & Otology 1983 Vol XCII No. 8.705-709 9.Rhinomanometry and Septoplasty J of Laryngology & Otology 1982 Vol XCVI No.11. 991-995 10.Inhibition of Histamine-Induced nasal symptoms by the Hl Antihistamine
Chlorpheniramine Maleate: Demonstration of topical effect. Br. J. Dis. Chest. 1983 Vol. 77. 113 122 11.The Central Rhythm of the nasal cycle. Acta Otolaryngol 1978 Vo186. 464 468 12.Changes in human nasal resistance associated with exercise,
hyperventilation and rebreathing. Acta Otolaryngol 1977 Vo. 84 416 421 13.Rinomanometria N. Mygind (1981) Allergie Nasali. Liviana Ed. Pagg.
234
237 14.Studio Rinomanometrico pre e post operatorio nella chirurgia conservativa dei turbinati inferior. G Pozzi. A. Corti, S Ponzi,
E Corgiolu, D Alpini, M. Brusa (1983). Riv. Orl Aud. Fon. Vol. IV, n. 3/84 15. Studio rinomanometrico su un gruppo di bambini affett'i da rinopatia affettis da rinopatia ostruttiva subronica. E Corgiolu, P
Marconi, D Alpini, A Corti, S Ponzi, M. Brusa. (1923) 16. Elaborazione di un rinogramme e identificazione statistica
del
range di
normal ita
con rinomanometro digitale.M Brusa, D Alpini,
A Corti,S Ponzi, E Corgiolu (1983) 17. Studio clinico su un gruppo di bambini affetti da rinopatia ostruttiva
subconica a probablie genesi atopica. Primi risultati. D Alpini, E Corgiolu, A
Corti, P.Marconi (1983)
Comunicazione
presentata Sl0 e Ch. C.'.F: Bologna al LXX congresso Nazionale della 25 28
maggio 1983 18.The effect of submucosal diathermy to the inferior turbinates on nasal
resistance to airflow in allergin and vasomotor rhinitis. A S Jones, J M Lancer,
A A Moir & J C Stevens. Clin Otolaryngol 1985, 249 252 19.Rhinomanometry IV. A Pre and Postoperative Evaluation in Functional
Septoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol 94: 523 529, 1982 20.Effect of aspirin on nasal resistance to airflow A S Jones, J M Lancer, A
A Moir, J C Stevens British Medical Journal -Volume 290 21.The effect of Lignocaine on nasal resistance and nasal sensation of
airflow. From Dept of Otolaryngolbgy Royal Hallamshire Hospital. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1986: 101 328-330 22.The effect of rapid Maxillary expansion on nasal airway resistance. Donald
J Timms,
Department of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, Royal Preston Hospital, P O Box 66, Preston.
British Journal of Orthodontics,Vol.13, 1986 221-228 23. Rhinomanometry at selection for adenoidectomy Rhinology, 25, 63-67, 1987 24.The lateralization percentage as a measure of nasal flow asymmetry in
active anterior rhinomanometry Clin. Otlolaryngol,
1980 5, 165-170 25.Nasal resistance measured by anterior rhinomanometry.
Rhinology 24, 49-55, 1986 26.Societa Italiana di Otorinolaringologia e Chirurgia Cervico Facciale. National Congress -Bologna 25-28 Maggio 1983 27.A new technique using a nasal cast for'anterior rhinomanometry. Rhinology 25, 109-115, 1987 28.Experimental Studies on nasal sensation of airflow R Eccles, B Lancashire
& N S Tolley from the Dept of Physiology, University College, Cardiff
29.The effect of aromatics on inspiratory and expiratory nasal resistance to
airflow. R Eccles, Barbara Lancashire and N S Tolley. Dept
of Physiology, University College, Cardiff, Wales. 30.Nasal changes following immersion in cholrinated
water. M Samll and JAM Murray, Edinburgh Rhinology 25, 153-157
1987 31.Review Rhinomanometry A S Jones and J M Lancer, Ear Nose and Throat Dept Royal Hallamshire
Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield. S102JF. Clin Otolaryngol. 1987 12, 233-236 Accepted for Publication 26th
Nov 1986 32.Rhinomanometric method error in the assessment of nasal respiratory
resistance. A Sandman Edinburgh, Rhinology 26, 191-201, 1988 33.Nasal resistance to airflow.(its measurement, reproductibility and
normal parameters) A S Jones and J M Lancer, J C Stevens and E Beckingham The Journal of Laryngology and Otology Vol. 101 No.8 8th
August 1987 34.A Microcomputer based procedure for carrying out rhinomanometry. J C Stevens, A S Jones, J Lancer and E Beckingham Journal of Medical Engineering &Technology Vol 11, No.6 (November
December 1987) Pages 278-281. 35. Computer aided Rhinometry: Analysis of Inspiratory and Expiratory
nasal pressure flow curves in subjects with Rhinitis. Michael J Schumacher -Dept of Pediatrics, Universityof Arizona Health
Sciences Center, Tucson. John A Gaines, University Hospital, Universityof Arizona, Tuscon Bruce
Bescript, Respiratory Sciences Division, University of Arizona 36.The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol 83 Number 4
Rhinomanometry, Michael J Schumacher. 37.Nasal airflow characteristics in a normgl
sample.Beni Solow and Andrew Sandham -Royal College Copenhagan and Dental School
University of Edinburgh 38.Evaluation of Anterior and Posterior
Rhinomanometry. D M Shelton, N M Eiser. ClinicalOtolaryngology 1992 17 178 182. 39.The influence of terfenadine and ipratropium
bromide alona and in combination on bradyinin-induced nasal symptoms and plasma
protein leakage. K Rajakulasingam, R Poloua, L C K Lau, M K
Church, S T Holgate, P H Howarth. Clinical and Experimental Allergy
1992 Vol. 22
Paper 343. 40.The effect of intranasal azelastine Rhinolast
on nasal airways obstruction and sneezing following provocation testing with
histamine and allergen. K E Thomas, S Ollier, H Fergusorl, R J Davies. Department of Respiratory Medicine, st
Bartholomews Hospital, London UV, and Advisory Services (Clinical & General)
Ltd, Harley Street, London, UK. Clinical and Experimental Allergy
1992 Vo:i..
22
Paper 327. 41.Other Techniques for assessing Nasal Function. Ronald Eccles, B.Sc, PhD, D.Sc. -Director, Common
Cold & Nasal Research Centre Department of Physiology, University of Wales
College of Cardiff, UK. 42. Nasal septal surgery as an out-patient procedure Peter Nieminen, MD, Juha Silvola, MD, Rudolf Aust,
MD, Lars-Eric Stenfors, MD Journal of Laryngology and Otology, November 1997,
Vol. III, pp 1034-1037 43. Subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis and
nonrhinitic subjects react differentially to nasal provocation with chlorine gas
Dennis J Shusterman, MD,MPH, Mary
Alice Murphy, MD,MPH and John R Balmes, MD The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology,
June] 998, Vol 101 , Number 6, pt. 1 44. Effect on nasal resistance of an externa] nasa] splint and isotonic
exercise. A Q Wilde, S R Ell BrJ SportsMed 1999,33:127128. 45. The external nasal dilator strip, worn overnight, produces an
increase in functional residual capacity. I. T. Campbell, F G Mason, M A Keegan,
S. Woods Physiological Society in London, December 2000
46. Leong SC, Eccles R. Inferior turbinate surgery and nasal airflow:
evidence-based management. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2010;18(1):54-59.
47. Farmer SE, Quine SM, Eccles R. Efficacy of inferior turbinate coblation for treatment of nasal obstruction. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123(3):309-314.
48. Clarke JD, Hopkins ML, Eccles R. How good are patients at determining
which side of the nose is more obstructed? A study on the limits of
discrimination of the subjective assessment of unilateral nasal obstruction.
Am J Rhinol. 2006;20(1):20-24.
49. Eccles R, Jawad MS, Jawad SS, Angello JT, Druce HM. Efficacy and safety of
single and multiple doses of pseudoephedrine in the treatment of nasal
congestion associated with common cold. Am J Rhinol. 2005;19(1):25-31.
50. Clarke JD, Hopkins ML, Eccles R. Evidence for correlation of objective and
subjective measures of nasal airflow in patients with common cold. Clin
Otolaryngol. 2005;30(1):35-38.
51. Clarke JD, Eccles R. Paradoxical sensation of nasal airflow in patients
with common cold. Are we measuring the correct modality? Acta Otolaryngol.
2005;125(12):1307-1311.
52. Hanif J, Jawad SS, Eccles R. A study to assess the usefulness of a
portable spirometer to quantify the severity of nasal septal deviation.
Rhinology. 2003;41(1):11-15.
53. Hanif J, M JSS, R E. Spirometry vs. rhinomanometry for studies on the
nasal cycle. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001;31(7):28-.
|
